Approaching, Understanding and Implementing Legal Settlements

At a time when our civil justice system is plagued by extreme delay, I am grateful to practice law in an area that is well known for its focus on creative and practical problem-solving and settling, as opposed to litigating disputes. There are certainly some labour and employment disputes which simply must be litigated, but the majority of disputes will ultimately be settled. 

There are many reasons why settlement is often an attractive option (the delay and cost of litigation, the peace of mind a settlement can bring, and avoiding the disruption and harm that litigation can cause to a business or its reputation …just to name a few) but in this blog we will provide some tips for considering, understanding and implementing legal settlements.

How Long?

Whether you’re an employer or employee, the prospect of entering into a legal dispute is typically unpleasant. Before you take settlement off the table, consider litigation by the numbers:

  • 1.5 years is the wait time for a judge to hear a motion over 2 hours in Toronto. This wait time is often the ‘best case scenario’ for litigants and only applies to specific cases;
  • 4-5 years is the average time it takes a civil trial to move from beginning to end.

Beyond being required to wait several years for a conclusion, you can also expect to spend several thousand dollars in legal fees. 

They want WHAT?!

If you’re engaged in settlement discussions, the chances that this started off as a relatively intense and/or emotional conflict are likely good. It’s easy to understand why you might be upset, angry or frustrated. As an employee, you may have just been terminated after what you see as years of loyal service. On the other hand, employers may be frustrated after receiving a list of demands from an employee who they feel was terminated following years of lacklustre performance. 

While it’s almost never pleasant to be on the sending or receiving end of a lengthy demand letter setting out legal entitlements and associated demands, it’s critical that when you approach the negotiation, you leave your emotions aside. Approaching a negotiation by focusing on how frustrated, hurt or angry you are will only serve to distract you from the potential compromise the settlement may represent. Further, it is even more important that you resist the urge to communicate these emotions to the opposing party as this will surely make dealing with them even more difficult. 

Legal Entitlements and Reasonable Asks

It’s critical that you approach the settlement understanding that any settlement is meant to avoid having to engage in the lengthy and costly litigation process. As a starting point, educate yourself with respect to what the opposing party may be entitled to should they be required to litigate the matter. For example, in employment disputes, understand what sorts of compensation would be awarded by the judge and for what period of time. Understanding the potential outcome of a court award will help you understand what sort of ‘asks’ are truly reasonable. 

What Can You Really Do?

If you’re seriously considering an offer to settle, you must also consider and carefully assess exactly what you can actually deliver. For example, does your business have the necessary funds available to meet a monetary demand or can you meet a demand to extend benefits given the terms and conditions of the group benefits plan? It’s critical that you cross your t’s and dot your i’s to ensure you can actually deliver on what you’ve promised before you actually offer those things up. Once you’ve come to an agreement (congratulations!), make sure to take note and meet any deadlines outlined by the settlement such as a timeline for payment. 

Settlement negotiations can be nuanced and it’s work we love to do! Get in touch if you need any assistance. 

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Blue alarm clock representing timing and Ontario employment termination clauses after Baker

“At Any Time” Gets Its Time: Is There Any Certainty for Ontario Employers After Baker? 

Ontario employers finally have more guidance on employment termination clauses. In Baker v Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.; Li v Wayfair Canada ULC, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld clauses using “at any time” and “for any reason.”

But Baker doesn’t give every employment contract a free pass. We unpack what the decision means for employers reviewing termination language today.

Read More »
Hands typing on a keyboard in front of illuminated computer screens, representing virtual workplace communication and online workplace misconduct.

Virtual Harassment: When Workplace Misconduct Happens Online 

Virtual harassment is becoming a growing workplace issue as employee interactions increasingly happen through digital platforms. From group chats and messaging apps to social media activity, online conduct can create real workplace consequences. Learn why employers should update workplace policies, extend conduct expectations beyond the office, and take a proactive approach to investigating and addressing virtual misconduct.

Read More »
December 31, 2026 AODA filing deadline for Ontario employers, displayed beside champagne glasses and gold New Year decorations

The Accessibility Deadline Many Ontario Businesses Don’t Know About: December 31, 2026

Ontario businesses and non-profits with 20 or more employees must file an AODA accessibility compliance report by December 31, 2026. Before certifying compliance, employers should confirm their headcount, complete required training, review accessibility policies and plans, address gaps, and file early. SpringLaw explains the deadline, key requirements, and practical steps Ontario employers should take now, before they file.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]