Accommodating Employees at Christmas

For those employees working in these industries, can an employee request accommodation to have December 25 off on the grounds of family status or religion? 

Christmas off as a Family Status Accommodation: Employers will not be required to accommodate an employee’s request for accommodation on Christmas day for “family time”. This is not a protected ground under Canadian human rights law and is simply a preference. “Family Status” is a protected ground under human rights law and refers to necessary caregiving duties between a parent and child. Accommodation (up to undue hardship to the employer) may be required if an employee is unable to work because of required caregiving duties, but these will rarely be the factors triggering a request on Christmas day, particularly if other parents or caregivers are available that day to perform the caregiving duties.

Christmas off as a Religious Accommodation:   Religious accommodation will have more traction. Under Canadian human rights law, employers are required to accommodate employees’ religious beliefs and practices to the point of undue hardship. This might include requests for religious observances, including Christmas. All jurisdictions in Canada include religion or creed as a human right to be protected, with Christianity enjoying no greater weight than any other religion during the Christmas holidays.

Employee obligations:

  • Inform the employer about their religious requirements in a timely manner.
  • Cooperate with the employer to provide reasonably requested documentation to support the request. This could include a letter from a priest or pastor confirming membership in a church that requires attendance on Christmas Day.
  • Be able to demonstrate a genuinely held belief triggering the request.

Employer obligations:

  • An employer must consider the request to accommodate but is not obligated to automatically grant accommodation.
  • Once accommodation is granted, the employer must provide an accommodation that respects the employee’s dignity and allows them to fully participate in the workplace, not necessarily the best possible accommodation or exactly what the employee requests.

Factors to Consider for Religious Accommodation:

  1. Reasonableness: The accommodation should not impose undue hardship on the employer. This includes factors such as cost, disruption to the workplace, and impact on other employees.
  2. Sincerity of Belief: The individual requesting the accommodation must have a sincerely held religious belief. This does not necessarily mean that the belief must be part of a mainstream religion or recognized by all followers of that religion.
  3. Impact on Others: The accommodation should not infringe on the rights or beliefs of others. This includes both coworkers and customers.
  4. Nature of Work: The nature of the job and the workplace may affect the feasibility of certain accommodations. For example, certain safety regulations may limit the types of accommodations that can be made.
  5. Size of the Organization: Larger organizations may have more resources and flexibility to provide accommodations than smaller ones.
  6. Alternatives: If there are alternative accommodations that would fulfill the individual’s religious needs without causing undue hardship, these should be considered.
  7. Fairness: The accommodation should be fair and not give the individual an unfair advantage over others.
  8. Consistency: The organization should be consistent in how it handles requests for religious accommodation. This helps to ensure fairness and avoid claims of discrimination.

Undue Hardship: The right to accommodation is not universal. Employers are only required to accommodate up to “undue hardship” to the employer. This is a high threshold that is determined based on factors like cost, outside sources of funding, and health and safety requirements. If an employer can prove that the accommodation would cause undue hardship, they may not be required to provide it.

Emotional Impact: As Hallmark and Hollywood movies will attest, Christmas is full of emotion and big feelings. An employer’s denial of a request to attend what may be a decades-long family tradition will trigger an emotional reaction beyond contractual niceties. On the other hand, granting the request to the most upset employee will most certainly have a ripple effect on some other employees prepared to accept the sacrifice. In many cases, it’s impossible to make everyone happy. Rotating shift obligations year to year and having an objective rationale for selecting employees to work on December 25 will help reduce the overall temperature. Throwing in some perks may also help incentivize employees less fussed about working at Christmas.

If you need a hand navigating this highly-charged time of the year, give us a shout!

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Blue alarm clock representing timing and Ontario employment termination clauses after Baker

“At Any Time” Gets Its Time: Is There Any Certainty for Ontario Employers After Baker? 

Ontario employers finally have more guidance on employment termination clauses. In Baker v Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.; Li v Wayfair Canada ULC, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld clauses using “at any time” and “for any reason.”

But Baker doesn’t give every employment contract a free pass. We unpack what the decision means for employers reviewing termination language today.

Read More »
Hands typing on a keyboard in front of illuminated computer screens, representing virtual workplace communication and online workplace misconduct.

Virtual Harassment: When Workplace Misconduct Happens Online 

Virtual harassment is becoming a growing workplace issue as employee interactions increasingly happen through digital platforms. From group chats and messaging apps to social media activity, online conduct can create real workplace consequences. Learn why employers should update workplace policies, extend conduct expectations beyond the office, and take a proactive approach to investigating and addressing virtual misconduct.

Read More »
December 31, 2026 AODA filing deadline for Ontario employers, displayed beside champagne glasses and gold New Year decorations

The Accessibility Deadline Many Ontario Businesses Don’t Know About: December 31, 2026

Ontario businesses and non-profits with 20 or more employees must file an AODA accessibility compliance report by December 31, 2026. Before certifying compliance, employers should confirm their headcount, complete required training, review accessibility policies and plans, address gaps, and file early. SpringLaw explains the deadline, key requirements, and practical steps Ontario employers should take now, before they file.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]