To google or not to google? Candidate background checks

In the information age, it’s usually relatively easy to find out all about someone by doing a simple Google search. The burning question of online daters, “do I google my date before the date?” applies equally to employers. Can, and should, an employer background check a candidate? If so when? And how deep can and should they go?

Background checks are common and are becoming more so. Here is a run down of some best practices.

What is a background check?

Job candidates might wonder what a background check is and why they are being asked to consent to one. A background check might include a closer look at:
Education
Professional credentials or registrations
Employment history and references
Driving record
Criminal background
Social media presence

This can reveal a lot of personal information. In all circumstances, the information required should be rationally connected to the job on offer. For example, your driving record should only be relevant where the job requires you to drive.

Interview the candidate first!

Going to town on Google once you know only what the applicant has revealed in their application can bring up a litany of information, much of which might touch on Human Rights Code (the Code) protected grounds. For example, googling a candidate might give you easy access to information about their age, gender or ethnicity. While some of this information might be apparent when you meet the candidate, all applicants should equally have an opportunity to present themselves and their qualifications. When an employer gathers outside information prior to a candidate being interviewed, the chances that this might not happen increase.

Better still would be to take the candidate on their word, make them a conditional offer of employment and then conduct a background check. This ensures that the decision about whether or not to hire is not tainted by Code protected grounds. If something turns up in the background check, the offer can be rescinded based on the fact that it was made conditional on passing the background check.

A further way to avoid tainting the interview and decision-making process is to have a person not making the final decision to conduct the online search and/or to outsource to a third party. This helps separate the roles and keeps the recruitment process focused on actual merit and less exposed to inadvertent human rights complaints.

Can and should employers do this?

As noted above, an employer can ask for a background check but the scope of the check should be rationally connected to the job itself. For example, a police vulnerable sector check makes sense if the job requires the candidate to be alone with small children. It does not make sense if the job is in a cheese factory.

In most cases, a background check should not be done prior to a conditional offer being made. Checks should also only be done with the candidate’s consent and only to the extent required to ensure that the applicant is qualified to do the job in question.

Takeaways

The message for employers? Restrain yourselves until you’ve made a provisional hiring decision based on the information the candidate has given to you. Take them at their word prior to digging into their background.

The message for candidates? If a potential employer is asking you for information that doesn’t seem relevant to the job, or if they are asking you to consent to a blanket check as part of the application process, they may not be the employer for you.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Colourful raised hands illustrating AI, workplace inclusion, accessibility and diverse participation.

Can AI Help Build a More Inclusive Workplace? 

Can AI help create a more inclusive workplace? From accessible communication tools to insights about hiring and advancement, AI can help employers spot barriers that are easy to miss. This blog explores how thoughtful AI use can support workplace equity, accessibility, and better decision making while keeping people, accountability, empathy, and responsible leadership at the centre of inclusion efforts.

Read More »
Runners leaving starting blocks on a track, representing how employers can proactively prepare for litigation

Avoid Stress. Proactively Prepare for Litigation

Litigation can arrive faster than you expect, bringing deadlines, paperwork and stress with it. Proactively preparing for litigation can help Ontario employers respond with greater clarity and confidence. From better documentation and clear workflows to compliance reviews and ongoing employment law support, thoughtful preparation can help protect your business, support your team and keep workplace issues from becoming bigger problems.

Read More »
Black and white cat showing teeth, illustrating a blog about workplace conflict and just cause for dismissal

Can You Tell Your Boss to F* Off and Keep Your Job? The Ontario Court of Appeal Weighs In 

Can you swear at your boss and still keep your job? Jeff Adams examines an Ontario Court of Appeal decision on just cause, workplace misconduct and condonation. The case shows why context matters when employers respond to threats, insulting workplace communications and misconduct, and why delays in discipline do not always mean an employer has accepted the conduct as permissible.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]