Substance Addictions at Work: A Guide for Employers – Part 1/4

Substance Addictions at Work
Photo by Jeff W on Unsplash

Many employers will at some point encounter drug and alcohol issues in the workplace. Under the Canadian Human Rights Act, substance dependence is considered a disability. An addiction to drugs or alcohol also constitutes a disability within the meaning of the Ontario Human Rights Code. 

An addiction should only become an issue for the employer, however, if it affects the employee’s work performance. Employers have a right to expect a certain level of performance and competency from their employees, but employees have a right to be accommodated for their disabilities to the point of undue hardship. 

COVID Challenges

The pandemic has given rise to many workplace and personal challenges, among them a rise in drug and alcohol addictions. COVID-19 has also created additional barriers for those with addictions in terms of the type, availability, and access to healthcare and social services. 

Detection & Remote Work

The three main avenues through which employers are generally made aware of an employee’s potential substance dependence issue are: disclosure by the employee, observation of signs of substance dependence, or a positive drug or alcohol test. 

In pre-pandemic times, employers and colleagues had the ability to check for signs of drug or alcohol intoxication. With the migration of large swaths of workers to the home as a result of COVID-19, and likelihood that the working-from-home arrangement is here to stay for many, the employer’s ability to detect such signs is marred – the employer cannot observe the employee’s unsteady gait as she walks to the bathroom, see her bloodshot eyes over the phone, or detect the odour of alcohol through the video screen. 

For employees working remotely, persistent absenteeism and/or tardiness from virtual meetings, slurred speech, or extended periods of poor productivity can, in some instances, be telltale signs of substance dependence. Employers should consider scheduling regular video meetings with employees, either individually or as a collective, and check in with employees periodically to spot any mental health issues and ensure employees feel supported. 

Duty to Inquire

If an employer believes that an employee may have a substance dependence issue, both the employee and the employer (in union environments, the union and/or employee representative as well), have responsibilities to address the issue in a timely, synergistic, and respectful manner.  Given the generally stigmatizing nature of addictions, many employees may be reluctant to disclose or even admit their conditions. Regardless, an employer has a duty to initiate a confidential and non-judgmental discussion with an employee about a need for accommodation for a disability when the employer reasonably believes there may be a relationship between a disability and job performance. Though this may be an awkward conversation to start, this duty to inquire is set out by both the Ontario Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

This is Part 1 of our 4-part series on substance dependence in the workplace. Stay tuned for Part 2 next week, when we’ll discuss the duty to accommodate, as well as provide some sample questions for employers to ask employees when gathering information related to a substance dependence disability.

If you have questions about substance dependence in the workplace, get in touch for a consultation!

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Canadian flag displayed in front of a government building, representing proposed federal labour law reforms under Bill C-39 and changes to the Canada Labour Code.

Federal Bill C-39: Major Changes Proposed for Federal Labour Relations 

Federal Bill C-39 proposes major changes to the Canada Labour Code that could reshape labour relations for federally regulated employers and unions. From expanded government intervention during strikes and lockouts to new collective bargaining rules and mediation processes, these reforms may significantly impact workplace disputes, collective agreements, and the balance between protecting workers’ rights and the national economy.

Read More »
Person working remotely on a laptop beside a swimming pool, illustrating remote worker management, employee accountability, and flexible work arrangements.

Remote Worker Management: Accountability without Constant Check-Ins 

Managing a remote team doesn’t require constant check-ins. Effective remote worker management comes from clear expectations, transparent systems, and trust. Learn how to create accountability, improve collaboration, and measure results without micromanaging employees. Discover practical strategies to build a productive remote workforce that stays aligned, engaged, and focused on outcomes rather than online presence.

Read More »
Mountain village with wooden buildings overlooking a valley, representing workplace accommodations that can evolve while supporting long-term stability and growth.

Can An Employer Change An Accommodation? 

Can an employer change a workplace accommodation once it has been in place for years? A recent Ontario court decision confirms that accommodations are not necessarily permanent. Employers have flexibility to modify accommodations when employees remain reasonably accommodated and free from discrimination. Learn what this ruling means for disability accommodation, workplace management, employee benefits, and legal compliance.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]