Employment Law 101: Mitigation

Mitigation issues can save an employer months of termination pay and/or gut your termination case, depending on whether you are the employer or employee in a dispute. But what exactly is mitigation? This post sets out the basics.

What is Mitigation?

In Canadian employment law, mitigation refers to the legal obligation of an employee who has been terminated or laid off to make reasonable efforts to find comparable employment. This principle of “mitigating damages” is used to reduce the potential compensation or termination package an employer may be required to pay. For instance, if an employee is terminated and they find a new job within a short period, the courts will set off the new income from the amount that the previous employer may be required to pay because the employee has mitigated their loss of income.

What Counts as Mitigation?

What constitutes “reasonable efforts” and “comparable employment” can vary greatly depending on the circumstances, such as the employee’s age, education, experience, and the availability of suitable jobs.

Mitigation includes:

1. Actively seeking new employment: This could involve applying for jobs, attending interviews, networking, etc.

2. Accepting a reasonable job offer: If a comparable job is offered, the employee is generally expected to accept it.

3. Undergoing retraining or upgrading skills: In some cases, the employee may be expected to take courses or undergo training to improve their employability.

4. Documenting job search efforts: The employee may need to provide evidence of their job search efforts, such as records of job applications or interviews.

5. Self-employment or freelance work: In some cases, efforts to start a business or work as a freelancer may count as mitigation.

If the employee fails to mitigate their losses, it may result in a reduction of their wrongful dismissal damages.

How does Mitigation Impact Your Employee’s Termination Package?

In Canada, when an employee is terminated without cause, they are generally entitled to a termination package. The impact of mitigation on an employee’s termination package can be significant. If the employee finds a new job quickly, the amount of their termination package may be reduced. This is because the purpose of the package is to compensate the employee for their loss of income during the period of unemployment. If the employee is able to mitigate their loss by finding new employment, their need for compensation is reduced.   For example, if an employee is entitled to a termination package that includes 6 months of pay, but they find a new job after 2 months, they may only receive 2 months of pay from their termination package. The remaining 4 months would be considered mitigated by the new employment.   However, it’s important to note that the duty to mitigate does not require the employee to accept any job that comes along.

The new job must be comparable to the one they lost in terms of pay, location, hours, and other factors.   In some cases, the employment contract or the termination agreement may specify whether and how the termination package will be affected by mitigation. Also, it’s important to note that in all cases no employer can pay out less than what is required under their applicable employment standards legislation, regardless of any contractual or termination package terms.   When proceeding with a termination, employers will want to keep this important legal concept on their radar and include mitigation terms within the termination settlement documents. Need a hand in contract drafting, reach out to our team today!

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Blue alarm clock representing timing and Ontario employment termination clauses after Baker

“At Any Time” Gets Its Time: Is There Any Certainty for Ontario Employers After Baker? 

Ontario employers finally have more guidance on employment termination clauses. In Baker v Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.; Li v Wayfair Canada ULC, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld clauses using “at any time” and “for any reason.”

But Baker doesn’t give every employment contract a free pass. We unpack what the decision means for employers reviewing termination language today.

Read More »
Hands typing on a keyboard in front of illuminated computer screens, representing virtual workplace communication and online workplace misconduct.

Virtual Harassment: When Workplace Misconduct Happens Online 

Virtual harassment is becoming a growing workplace issue as employee interactions increasingly happen through digital platforms. From group chats and messaging apps to social media activity, online conduct can create real workplace consequences. Learn why employers should update workplace policies, extend conduct expectations beyond the office, and take a proactive approach to investigating and addressing virtual misconduct.

Read More »
December 31, 2026 AODA filing deadline for Ontario employers, displayed beside champagne glasses and gold New Year decorations

The Accessibility Deadline Many Ontario Businesses Don’t Know About: December 31, 2026

Ontario businesses and non-profits with 20 or more employees must file an AODA accessibility compliance report by December 31, 2026. Before certifying compliance, employers should confirm their headcount, complete required training, review accessibility policies and plans, address gaps, and file early. SpringLaw explains the deadline, key requirements, and practical steps Ontario employers should take now, before they file.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]