Cancel Culture at Work: Terminating Employees for Inappropriate Behaviour

Terminating Employees for Inappropriate Behaviour
Photo by mana5280 on Unsplash

In the wake of the killing of George Floyd and in the midst of protests and heightened awareness of anti-black racism across the world, two prominent Canadians have been “cancelled.”

Earlier this month Sasha Exeter, lifestyle blogger and influencer, called out Jessica Mulroney for “textbook white privilege.” Exeter explained, calling out Mulroney by name, that Mulroney took offence to her call to action for people with large public followings to use their platforms to address racial inequality and then proceeded to threaten Exeter and her brand.  Soon after Mulroney’s reality show, “I Do, Redo” had been cancelled by CTV, and Cityline, Good Morning America, Hudson’s Bay and apparently Meghan Markle, had all cut their ties with the star.

Mulroney’s fall was preceded by CBC TV host Wendy Mesley’s suspension from her show “The Weekly,” pending an investigation into her use of a racist word during a meeting. Again, details are fuzzy, but Mesley said on Twitter that she “used a word that should never be used” and that she was “quoting a journalist we were intending to interview on a panel discussion about coverage of racial inequality.” 

Can Employers Really Cancel Employees?

Probably, yes. 

Employers should take a strong stand against racism and inappropriate behaviour, especially where it occurs in the context of work. In Ontario, workplace harassment is prohibited by the Occupational Health and Safety Act and harassment that might be motivated by racism is also contrary to the Ontario Human Rights Code. Employers should have Anti-Harassment and Anti-Discrimination policies that address both of these requirements and employees should be trained on the content of these policies. 

If infringements of the policies or the law occur during work, employees should be disciplined appropriately. Firing an employee for cause could be warranted if the breach is particularly bad, or if the employee has been counselled several times and has continually not improved. In all cases, employers should address problematic behaviour with employees, give the employee a chance to respond and keep good records of the incidents and follow up. In some cases, such as Mesley’s, an investigation will be warranted. The Occupational Health and Safety Act requires that incidents of harassment are investigated. 

What About For Behaviour Outside of Work?

Similar to the questions we asked in our blog last week about when an employee is criminally charged, the extent to which an employer will be able to take job action against an employee who has acted inappropriately outside of the workplace will be context-specific. 

One major thing to consider will be the employee’s public connection to the employer. For example, did the employee tweet something inappropriate from a Twitter account where they are listed as an employee of your organization? Or from their Instagram account wearing a company uniform?  If the employee’s behaviour is likely to lead back to the employer and somehow tarnish it, then the employee has mixed their personal and professional life and should likely suffer the consequences. For more on this listen to my interview on Cancel Culture with CBC Radio from last Fall. 

Remember, absent discriminatory reasons, an employer can almost always terminate an employee’s employment with appropriate notice (or pay in lieu of notice). While an inappropriate   Facebook post may not be sufficient cause for termination, an employer generally does not have to continue employing someone they do not want to or whose values conflict with the organization.

If you need help dealing with inappropriate employee behaviour, on or off the job, get in touch for a consultation.  

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Blue alarm clock representing timing and Ontario employment termination clauses after Baker

“At Any Time” Gets Its Time: Is There Any Certainty for Ontario Employers After Baker? 

Ontario employers finally have more guidance on employment termination clauses. In Baker v Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.; Li v Wayfair Canada ULC, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld clauses using “at any time” and “for any reason.”

But Baker doesn’t give every employment contract a free pass. We unpack what the decision means for employers reviewing termination language today.

Read More »
Hands typing on a keyboard in front of illuminated computer screens, representing virtual workplace communication and online workplace misconduct.

Virtual Harassment: When Workplace Misconduct Happens Online 

Virtual harassment is becoming a growing workplace issue as employee interactions increasingly happen through digital platforms. From group chats and messaging apps to social media activity, online conduct can create real workplace consequences. Learn why employers should update workplace policies, extend conduct expectations beyond the office, and take a proactive approach to investigating and addressing virtual misconduct.

Read More »
December 31, 2026 AODA filing deadline for Ontario employers, displayed beside champagne glasses and gold New Year decorations

The Accessibility Deadline Many Ontario Businesses Don’t Know About: December 31, 2026

Ontario businesses and non-profits with 20 or more employees must file an AODA accessibility compliance report by December 31, 2026. Before certifying compliance, employers should confirm their headcount, complete required training, review accessibility policies and plans, address gaps, and file early. SpringLaw explains the deadline, key requirements, and practical steps Ontario employers should take now, before they file.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]