Did your employee really mean to retire?

You can take it back. The Ontario Court of Appeal has ruled that employees can take back their intention to retire. We have spoken about whether an employee can take back their intention to retire in a previous blog post regarding the Ontario Superior Court decision in English v. Manulife Financial Corporation. This decision was recently overturned by the Ontario Court of Appeal.

2018 Superior Court Decision

English, the 66-year-old employee in this case, provided Manulife, her employer, with a resignation letter after she became aware of their intention to change the computer system. The employer accepted her offer but informed her that she could rescind or reconsider her resignation. On October 11, 2016, less than three weeks after English’s resignation, Manulife announced that it would “suspend the conversion indefinitely.”

A couple of weeks later, English informed her employer that she intended to rescind her resignation upon news that the conversion was no longer scheduled. Manulife chose to accept her resignation anyway and ended her employment on December 12, 2016.  English subsequently sued for wrongful dismissal.

The Superior Court found in favour of Manulife on the grounds that English’s notice of retirement was clear and unequivocal and while Manulife could have chosen to rescind her resignation, they were not obligated to do so. The court referred to the basic principles of contract law which state that a contract that has been offered and accepted will be enforced by the courts unless the terms of the contract are ambiguous. 

2019 Court of Appeal Decision

The Court of Appeal disagreed with the motion judge’s finding, deciding instead that English’s retirement letter was not clear and unequivocal; therefore, she was entitled to withdraw it. The court reasoned that at the time English informed Manulife of her intention to resign she also told them she was unsure whether she wanted to resign. Her employer responded by saying that she could change her mind at a later date. Manulife is bound to the assurance it made to English that she could change her mind. For this reason, English’s termination was ruled a wrongful dismissal.

Takeaways

When an employee presents a letter of resignation, you should inquire into the circumstances surrounding their decision, particularly in instances where the resignation is a surprise or otherwise unusual. The lesson to be learned from this is that an employee’s resignation may not be enough to establish that there is a clear and unequivocal intention to resign.  Also, be mindful of the assurances you provide to employees at the time of dismissal as they may be able to rely on these statements later.

Get in touch if you have any questions about employee resignations!

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Canadian flag displayed in front of a government building, representing proposed federal labour law reforms under Bill C-39 and changes to the Canada Labour Code.

Federal Bill C-39: Major Changes Proposed for Federal Labour Relations 

Federal Bill C-39 proposes major changes to the Canada Labour Code that could reshape labour relations for federally regulated employers and unions. From expanded government intervention during strikes and lockouts to new collective bargaining rules and mediation processes, these reforms may significantly impact workplace disputes, collective agreements, and the balance between protecting workers’ rights and the national economy.

Read More »
Person working remotely on a laptop beside a swimming pool, illustrating remote worker management, employee accountability, and flexible work arrangements.

Remote Worker Management: Accountability without Constant Check-Ins 

Managing a remote team doesn’t require constant check-ins. Effective remote worker management comes from clear expectations, transparent systems, and trust. Learn how to create accountability, improve collaboration, and measure results without micromanaging employees. Discover practical strategies to build a productive remote workforce that stays aligned, engaged, and focused on outcomes rather than online presence.

Read More »
Mountain village with wooden buildings overlooking a valley, representing workplace accommodations that can evolve while supporting long-term stability and growth.

Can An Employer Change An Accommodation? 

Can an employer change a workplace accommodation once it has been in place for years? A recent Ontario court decision confirms that accommodations are not necessarily permanent. Employers have flexibility to modify accommodations when employees remain reasonably accommodated and free from discrimination. Learn what this ruling means for disability accommodation, workplace management, employee benefits, and legal compliance.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]