Did your employee really mean to retire?

You can take it back. The Ontario Court of Appeal has ruled that employees can take back their intention to retire. We have spoken about whether an employee can take back their intention to retire in a previous blog post regarding the Ontario Superior Court decision in English v. Manulife Financial Corporation. This decision was recently overturned by the Ontario Court of Appeal.

2018 Superior Court Decision

English, the 66-year-old employee in this case, provided Manulife, her employer, with a resignation letter after she became aware of their intention to change the computer system. The employer accepted her offer but informed her that she could rescind or reconsider her resignation. On October 11, 2016, less than three weeks after English’s resignation, Manulife announced that it would “suspend the conversion indefinitely.”

A couple of weeks later, English informed her employer that she intended to rescind her resignation upon news that the conversion was no longer scheduled. Manulife chose to accept her resignation anyway and ended her employment on December 12, 2016.  English subsequently sued for wrongful dismissal.

The Superior Court found in favour of Manulife on the grounds that English’s notice of retirement was clear and unequivocal and while Manulife could have chosen to rescind her resignation, they were not obligated to do so. The court referred to the basic principles of contract law which state that a contract that has been offered and accepted will be enforced by the courts unless the terms of the contract are ambiguous. 

2019 Court of Appeal Decision

The Court of Appeal disagreed with the motion judge’s finding, deciding instead that English’s retirement letter was not clear and unequivocal; therefore, she was entitled to withdraw it. The court reasoned that at the time English informed Manulife of her intention to resign she also told them she was unsure whether she wanted to resign. Her employer responded by saying that she could change her mind at a later date. Manulife is bound to the assurance it made to English that she could change her mind. For this reason, English’s termination was ruled a wrongful dismissal.

Takeaways

When an employee presents a letter of resignation, you should inquire into the circumstances surrounding their decision, particularly in instances where the resignation is a surprise or otherwise unusual. The lesson to be learned from this is that an employee’s resignation may not be enough to establish that there is a clear and unequivocal intention to resign.  Also, be mindful of the assurances you provide to employees at the time of dismissal as they may be able to rely on these statements later.

Get in touch if you have any questions about employee resignations!

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Employees reviewing AI-generated work on a computer in an office, highlighting the importance of AI expert oversight and responsible workplace AI use.

Your AI Isn’t the Expert. You Are.

AI can generate answers in seconds, but speed doesn’t guarantee accuracy. Employers who rely on AI without proper oversight may expose their businesses to legal, privacy, and reputational risks. Discover why expert review matters, what AI gets wrong, and how a responsible AI strategy can help your organization benefit from innovation while minimizing risk.

Read More »
Overhead view of a modern workspace with a laptop, resumes, job description documents, notebook, coffee mug, and subtle digital connections showing how AI is already integrated into everyday workplace tasks.

Why Every Employer Now Needs an AI Policy (Even If You Think You Don’t Use AI) 

Think your company doesn’t use AI? Think again. Employees are already using AI tools to draft emails, review resumes, and create content, often without formal approval. An AI policy helps employers manage privacy, confidentiality, intellectual property, and compliance risks while encouraging responsible innovation. Learn why every employer needs clear AI guidelines before a problem arises.

Read More »
Two workplace professionals reviewing information on a laptop during a discussion about employee wellbeing and psychological safety in a modern office.

Psychological Safety and Employer Liability in Ontario: What You Need to Know 

Psychological safety is no longer just an HR concern. Ontario employers are increasingly expected to identify and address workplace factors that can contribute to psychological harm. From harassment and bullying to WSIB mental stress claims, failing to manage these risks can have legal consequences. Learn what psychological safety means in practice and why employers should take proactive steps now.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]