The Legal Risks of Dismissing Workplace Complaints Too Quickly

You are an employer in Ontario. An employee has raised concerns about a colleague’s behaviour. Whether the allegations could amount to workplace harassment, workplace violence, discrimination, or other inappropriate conduct, your response matters.
 
It’s natural to have an immediate reaction. Pay attention to that!  You may believe the respondent would never act that way, or you may feel the complainant has a history of raising concerns. However, when workplace allegations arise, assumptions can quickly create legal risk. Ask yourself: if your first instinct is to dismiss the complaint, or if those around you are inclined to downplay it, that’s a sign. The safest approach is to pause, remain objective, and follow a fair investigation process. It may be time to consider bringing in an external, independent investigator. An independent investigation can help ensure the process is objective, credible, and aligned with legal requirements.
 
Many employers are surprised to learn that a workplace investigation begins long before interviews are scheduled. Key decisions about communication, documentation, interim workplace measures, and confidentiality can significantly affect the integrity of the process. Getting guidance early can help employers navigate these challenges while maintaining trust and fairness for everyone involved.
 
Over the course of my career, I’ve not only conducted workplace investigations as an investigator, but I’ve also guided employers, complainants, and respondents through the investigation process. One thing I’ve seen repeatedly is that organizations often struggle most at the beginning. Determining how – and how quickly – to respond, what steps to take, and whether an external investigator is needed can be just as important as the investigation itself.
 
Ontario law has evolved, and employers now have a clear obligation under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) and the Ontario Human Rights Code. When allegations arise that could amount to harassment, workplace violence, or discriminatory conduct, employers must conduct an investigation that is reasonable and appropriate to the situation. Confidentiality is key. During the process, it’s crucial to protect the privacy of all parties involved. Ontario law also prohibits retaliation. No one can face negative consequences for participating in good faith.
 
Small to medium-sized employers are sometimes tempted to address workplace complaints informally or internally without a structured process. But under the OHSA and the Human Rights Code, that approach can create risk. A reasonable, appropriate, and neutral investigation is not just best practice. It’s the law.
 
From an employer’s perspective, a well-managed workplace investigation is about more than legal compliance. It helps demonstrate that concerns are being taken seriously, supports psychological safety in the workplace, and can reduce the likelihood of further conflict or litigation.
 
In today’s legal landscape, ignoring or brushing off allegations can open the door to legal liability. By understanding your duties under Ontario law and recognizing when to seek independent investigation support or guidance through the process, you can better protect your organization, reduce legal risk, and foster a safer, fairer workplace for everyone.
 
For Ontario employers, taking every complaint seriously and following through with a fair, appropriate investigation isn’t optional. It’s essential. Contact us for more information and guidance.
Share the Post:

Related Posts

Blue alarm clock representing timing and Ontario employment termination clauses after Baker

“At Any Time” Gets Its Time: Is There Any Certainty for Ontario Employers After Baker? 

Ontario employers finally have more guidance on employment termination clauses. In Baker v Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.; Li v Wayfair Canada ULC, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld clauses using “at any time” and “for any reason.”

But Baker doesn’t give every employment contract a free pass. We unpack what the decision means for employers reviewing termination language today.

Read More »
Hands typing on a keyboard in front of illuminated computer screens, representing virtual workplace communication and online workplace misconduct.

Virtual Harassment: When Workplace Misconduct Happens Online 

Virtual harassment is becoming a growing workplace issue as employee interactions increasingly happen through digital platforms. From group chats and messaging apps to social media activity, online conduct can create real workplace consequences. Learn why employers should update workplace policies, extend conduct expectations beyond the office, and take a proactive approach to investigating and addressing virtual misconduct.

Read More »
December 31, 2026 AODA filing deadline for Ontario employers, displayed beside champagne glasses and gold New Year decorations

The Accessibility Deadline Many Ontario Businesses Don’t Know About: December 31, 2026

Ontario businesses and non-profits with 20 or more employees must file an AODA accessibility compliance report by December 31, 2026. Before certifying compliance, employers should confirm their headcount, complete required training, review accessibility policies and plans, address gaps, and file early. SpringLaw explains the deadline, key requirements, and practical steps Ontario employers should take now, before they file.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]