The Legal Risks of Dismissing Workplace Complaints Too Quickly

You are an employer in Ontario. An employee has raised concerns about a colleague’s behaviour. Whether the allegations could amount to workplace harassment, workplace violence, discrimination, or other inappropriate conduct, your response matters.
 
It’s natural to have an immediate reaction. Pay attention to that!  You may believe the respondent would never act that way, or you may feel the complainant has a history of raising concerns. However, when workplace allegations arise, assumptions can quickly create legal risk. Ask yourself: if your first instinct is to dismiss the complaint, or if those around you are inclined to downplay it, that’s a sign. The safest approach is to pause, remain objective, and follow a fair investigation process. It may be time to consider bringing in an external, independent investigator. An independent investigation can help ensure the process is objective, credible, and aligned with legal requirements.
 
Many employers are surprised to learn that a workplace investigation begins long before interviews are scheduled. Key decisions about communication, documentation, interim workplace measures, and confidentiality can significantly affect the integrity of the process. Getting guidance early can help employers navigate these challenges while maintaining trust and fairness for everyone involved.
 
Over the course of my career, I’ve not only conducted workplace investigations as an investigator, but I’ve also guided employers, complainants, and respondents through the investigation process. One thing I’ve seen repeatedly is that organizations often struggle most at the beginning. Determining how – and how quickly – to respond, what steps to take, and whether an external investigator is needed can be just as important as the investigation itself.
 
Ontario law has evolved, and employers now have a clear obligation under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) and the Ontario Human Rights Code. When allegations arise that could amount to harassment, workplace violence, or discriminatory conduct, employers must conduct an investigation that is reasonable and appropriate to the situation. Confidentiality is key. During the process, it’s crucial to protect the privacy of all parties involved. Ontario law also prohibits retaliation. No one can face negative consequences for participating in good faith.
 
Small to medium-sized employers are sometimes tempted to address workplace complaints informally or internally without a structured process. But under the OHSA and the Human Rights Code, that approach can create risk. A reasonable, appropriate, and neutral investigation is not just best practice. It’s the law.
 
From an employer’s perspective, a well-managed workplace investigation is about more than legal compliance. It helps demonstrate that concerns are being taken seriously, supports psychological safety in the workplace, and can reduce the likelihood of further conflict or litigation.
 
In today’s legal landscape, ignoring or brushing off allegations can open the door to legal liability. By understanding your duties under Ontario law and recognizing when to seek independent investigation support or guidance through the process, you can better protect your organization, reduce legal risk, and foster a safer, fairer workplace for everyone.
 
For Ontario employers, taking every complaint seriously and following through with a fair, appropriate investigation isn’t optional. It’s essential. Contact us for more information and guidance.
Share the Post:

Related Posts

Canadian flag displayed in front of a government building, representing proposed federal labour law reforms under Bill C-39 and changes to the Canada Labour Code.

Federal Bill C-39: Major Changes Proposed for Federal Labour Relations 

Federal Bill C-39 proposes major changes to the Canada Labour Code that could reshape labour relations for federally regulated employers and unions. From expanded government intervention during strikes and lockouts to new collective bargaining rules and mediation processes, these reforms may significantly impact workplace disputes, collective agreements, and the balance between protecting workers’ rights and the national economy.

Read More »
Person working remotely on a laptop beside a swimming pool, illustrating remote worker management, employee accountability, and flexible work arrangements.

Remote Worker Management: Accountability without Constant Check-Ins 

Managing a remote team doesn’t require constant check-ins. Effective remote worker management comes from clear expectations, transparent systems, and trust. Learn how to create accountability, improve collaboration, and measure results without micromanaging employees. Discover practical strategies to build a productive remote workforce that stays aligned, engaged, and focused on outcomes rather than online presence.

Read More »
Mountain village with wooden buildings overlooking a valley, representing workplace accommodations that can evolve while supporting long-term stability and growth.

Can An Employer Change An Accommodation? 

Can an employer change a workplace accommodation once it has been in place for years? A recent Ontario court decision confirms that accommodations are not necessarily permanent. Employers have flexibility to modify accommodations when employees remain reasonably accommodated and free from discrimination. Learn what this ruling means for disability accommodation, workplace management, employee benefits, and legal compliance.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]