Formal Equality vs. Substantive Equality: When Equality Doesn’t Mean Equal Treatment

Happy Black History Month Canada! Black History month has us thinking about equality and what workplaces can do to increase their equality and diversity. We all know by now that diversity is good for business.

The Canadian law, through various devices and broadly speaking, attempts to promote equality and inclusion. A question that often comes up when employers are thinking about increasing diversity in their workplaces is if favouring minorities when hiring is really treating everyone equally. Doesn’t equality mean we treat everyone, black, white and purple the same? Actually, no! Read on. 

Treating Everyone the Same Does Not Necessarily Lead to Equality 

We don’t all start off at the same starting line in life. When we measure people by the exact same metrics often those who are from groups that are historically disadvantaged will get left behind when competing against their more privileged peers.  However, in Ontario, favouring minorities for a position could still land you in breach of the Ontario Human Rights Code, because you would be discriminating based on race (or any other prohibited ground) in your hiring decision.

Enter affirmative action! The Code allows employers to develop “special programs,” which will allow them to discriminate based on a protected group, where the objective is to promote the success of a historically marginalized group.

Special Programs Under the Code

Section 14 of the Code states that it is not discriminatory to put in place a program if it is designed to:

  • relieve hardship or economic disadvantage
  • help disadvantaged people achieve, or try to achieve, equal opportunity or
  • to contribute to the elimination of the infringement of rights under Part I

A program must satisfy at least one of these points to be a special program under the Code.

In order to discriminate in this way, employers need to apply to the Human Rights Commission to designate their program as a “special program” under the Code.

Special Employment

Section 24 of the Code also allows for discrimination with respect to employment where an organization is primarily engaged in serving the interests of persons identified by a prohibited group of discrimination. In these instances, identification with a specific Code-protected group is a genuine qualification for the job. For example, a woman’s shelter would be justified in discriminating in hiring by only hiring women because they are a special interest organization serving women.

Takeaways

Creating real substantive equality in our workplaces is definitely tricky. The Ontario Human Rights Commission provides lots of useful information, including this guide. If you’d like to work with us to create a special program or increase diversity in your workplace, get in touch to book a consultation.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Blue alarm clock representing timing and Ontario employment termination clauses after Baker

“At Any Time” Gets Its Time: Is There Any Certainty for Ontario Employers After Baker? 

Ontario employers finally have more guidance on employment termination clauses. In Baker v Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.; Li v Wayfair Canada ULC, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld clauses using “at any time” and “for any reason.”

But Baker doesn’t give every employment contract a free pass. We unpack what the decision means for employers reviewing termination language today.

Read More »
Hands typing on a keyboard in front of illuminated computer screens, representing virtual workplace communication and online workplace misconduct.

Virtual Harassment: When Workplace Misconduct Happens Online 

Virtual harassment is becoming a growing workplace issue as employee interactions increasingly happen through digital platforms. From group chats and messaging apps to social media activity, online conduct can create real workplace consequences. Learn why employers should update workplace policies, extend conduct expectations beyond the office, and take a proactive approach to investigating and addressing virtual misconduct.

Read More »
December 31, 2026 AODA filing deadline for Ontario employers, displayed beside champagne glasses and gold New Year decorations

The Accessibility Deadline Many Ontario Businesses Don’t Know About: December 31, 2026

Ontario businesses and non-profits with 20 or more employees must file an AODA accessibility compliance report by December 31, 2026. Before certifying compliance, employers should confirm their headcount, complete required training, review accessibility policies and plans, address gaps, and file early. SpringLaw explains the deadline, key requirements, and practical steps Ontario employers should take now, before they file.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]