Privacy Compliance: We’re Watching You, Employees, But Not Really

With only a few business days left before October 11, 2022, when employers must have a written Electronic Monitoring Policy in place, SpringLaw is fielding regular questions from employers about their near-final drafts. The policy requirements and meeting this new transparency obligation are discussed in our prior blog: New Electronic Monitoring Policy: The What, How and Why for Employers. The deadline for providing a written copy to employees is November 10, 2022.

Step One: Review Your Current Electronic Monitoring Practices

Employers with a buttoned-down approach should start with a broad review of their current monitoring practices. This may unearth some overkill monitoring and data collection – passive and unintentional, or otherwise. 

Step Two: Determine What Practices Need to End, Change or Continue

Decide whether the monitoring is worthwhile by asking:

  1. Is it necessary? 
  2. Is it effective?
  3. Is the loss of employee privacy proportionate to the employer’s right to protect its assets and manage employee safety, performance, and productivity?
  4. Is there a less intrusive way to gather the information?  

Whatever monitoring practices make the cut need to be outlined in the Electronic Monitoring Policy, along with the intended use of the information gathered.

Step 3: Communication is Key!

As with any new workplace policy rollout, employee communication is key – especially where it involves employee monitoring. Many employers are far too busy to analyze an employee’s keystrokes or their whereabouts after a lunchtime workout. From an employee relations standpoint, the hope is that data from employee monitoring is never actually needed or reviewed. Employees do sometimes go rogue, however, and employers may have reasonable bases for calling up and reviewing data from their electronic monitoring practices. A written policy giving employees notice of this possibility is essential. Assuming the loss of employee privacy in this process is proportionate to the benefit gained, and there was no less intrusive method of gathering the information, then all should be fine.

Finding A Fine Balance

Following the ‘great resignation’ and in today’s climate of ‘quiet-quitters’, boundary-setting employees will have employee privacy rights at the top of their list. Some types of employer monitoring may be surprising and downright offensive in terms of their intrusiveness, leading to pushback from employees (e.g. employer access to random screenshots of employee computer activity, or viewing of ‘private’ chats with co-workers). 

Employers should anticipate being pressed after setting out the ‘what’, ‘why’ and’ how’ of their electronic monitoring. If employers take a purposeful and practical approach and limit their monitoring to only what is necessary and reasonable (and effective), it is more likely to be accepted by employees. It is also important to emphasize that employee privacy rights are not impacted by the new policy and that the employer will act reasonably and in the least intrusive manner. Giving employees that written heads up that information gathered through monitoring may be used by employers is key. 

A key goal of any properly implemented, reasonable Electronic Monitoring Policy should be to deter unauthorized workplace conduct, not to create that gotcha moment. Aren’t we all on our best behaviour if we know we might be being watched?

Need Help With Your Privacy Compliance?

If you need a hand rolling out both your Electronic Monitoring Policy and overall compliance system, SpringLaw has teamed up with The PrivacyPro and nNovation to provide an integrated privacy and employment law offering, along with the expertise to tactically review your privacy ecosystem and roll out solutions. Contact us if you would like to learn more about our collaborative Employee Monitoring Service Package to help your organization get compliant on time.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Blue alarm clock representing timing and Ontario employment termination clauses after Baker

“At Any Time” Gets Its Time: Is There Any Certainty for Ontario Employers After Baker? 

Ontario employers finally have more guidance on employment termination clauses. In Baker v Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.; Li v Wayfair Canada ULC, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld clauses using “at any time” and “for any reason.”

But Baker doesn’t give every employment contract a free pass. We unpack what the decision means for employers reviewing termination language today.

Read More »
Hands typing on a keyboard in front of illuminated computer screens, representing virtual workplace communication and online workplace misconduct.

Virtual Harassment: When Workplace Misconduct Happens Online 

Virtual harassment is becoming a growing workplace issue as employee interactions increasingly happen through digital platforms. From group chats and messaging apps to social media activity, online conduct can create real workplace consequences. Learn why employers should update workplace policies, extend conduct expectations beyond the office, and take a proactive approach to investigating and addressing virtual misconduct.

Read More »
December 31, 2026 AODA filing deadline for Ontario employers, displayed beside champagne glasses and gold New Year decorations

The Accessibility Deadline Many Ontario Businesses Don’t Know About: December 31, 2026

Ontario businesses and non-profits with 20 or more employees must file an AODA accessibility compliance report by December 31, 2026. Before certifying compliance, employers should confirm their headcount, complete required training, review accessibility policies and plans, address gaps, and file early. SpringLaw explains the deadline, key requirements, and practical steps Ontario employers should take now, before they file.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]