Privacy Compliance: We’re Watching You, Employees, But Not Really

With only a few business days left before October 11, 2022, when employers must have a written Electronic Monitoring Policy in place, SpringLaw is fielding regular questions from employers about their near-final drafts. The policy requirements and meeting this new transparency obligation are discussed in our prior blog: New Electronic Monitoring Policy: The What, How and Why for Employers. The deadline for providing a written copy to employees is November 10, 2022.

Step One: Review Your Current Electronic Monitoring Practices

Employers with a buttoned-down approach should start with a broad review of their current monitoring practices. This may unearth some overkill monitoring and data collection – passive and unintentional, or otherwise. 

Step Two: Determine What Practices Need to End, Change or Continue

Decide whether the monitoring is worthwhile by asking:

  1. Is it necessary? 
  2. Is it effective?
  3. Is the loss of employee privacy proportionate to the employer’s right to protect its assets and manage employee safety, performance, and productivity?
  4. Is there a less intrusive way to gather the information?  

Whatever monitoring practices make the cut need to be outlined in the Electronic Monitoring Policy, along with the intended use of the information gathered.

Step 3: Communication is Key!

As with any new workplace policy rollout, employee communication is key – especially where it involves employee monitoring. Many employers are far too busy to analyze an employee’s keystrokes or their whereabouts after a lunchtime workout. From an employee relations standpoint, the hope is that data from employee monitoring is never actually needed or reviewed. Employees do sometimes go rogue, however, and employers may have reasonable bases for calling up and reviewing data from their electronic monitoring practices. A written policy giving employees notice of this possibility is essential. Assuming the loss of employee privacy in this process is proportionate to the benefit gained, and there was no less intrusive method of gathering the information, then all should be fine.

Finding A Fine Balance

Following the ‘great resignation’ and in today’s climate of ‘quiet-quitters’, boundary-setting employees will have employee privacy rights at the top of their list. Some types of employer monitoring may be surprising and downright offensive in terms of their intrusiveness, leading to pushback from employees (e.g. employer access to random screenshots of employee computer activity, or viewing of ‘private’ chats with co-workers). 

Employers should anticipate being pressed after setting out the ‘what’, ‘why’ and’ how’ of their electronic monitoring. If employers take a purposeful and practical approach and limit their monitoring to only what is necessary and reasonable (and effective), it is more likely to be accepted by employees. It is also important to emphasize that employee privacy rights are not impacted by the new policy and that the employer will act reasonably and in the least intrusive manner. Giving employees that written heads up that information gathered through monitoring may be used by employers is key. 

A key goal of any properly implemented, reasonable Electronic Monitoring Policy should be to deter unauthorized workplace conduct, not to create that gotcha moment. Aren’t we all on our best behaviour if we know we might be being watched?

Need Help With Your Privacy Compliance?

If you need a hand rolling out both your Electronic Monitoring Policy and overall compliance system, SpringLaw has teamed up with The PrivacyPro and nNovation to provide an integrated privacy and employment law offering, along with the expertise to tactically review your privacy ecosystem and roll out solutions. Contact us if you would like to learn more about our collaborative Employee Monitoring Service Package to help your organization get compliant on time.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Employees reviewing AI-generated work on a computer in an office, highlighting the importance of AI expert oversight and responsible workplace AI use.

Your AI Isn’t the Expert. You Are.

AI can generate answers in seconds, but speed doesn’t guarantee accuracy. Employers who rely on AI without proper oversight may expose their businesses to legal, privacy, and reputational risks. Discover why expert review matters, what AI gets wrong, and how a responsible AI strategy can help your organization benefit from innovation while minimizing risk.

Read More »
Overhead view of a modern workspace with a laptop, resumes, job description documents, notebook, coffee mug, and subtle digital connections showing how AI is already integrated into everyday workplace tasks.

Why Every Employer Now Needs an AI Policy (Even If You Think You Don’t Use AI) 

Think your company doesn’t use AI? Think again. Employees are already using AI tools to draft emails, review resumes, and create content, often without formal approval. An AI policy helps employers manage privacy, confidentiality, intellectual property, and compliance risks while encouraging responsible innovation. Learn why every employer needs clear AI guidelines before a problem arises.

Read More »
Two workplace professionals reviewing information on a laptop during a discussion about employee wellbeing and psychological safety in a modern office.

Psychological Safety and Employer Liability in Ontario: What You Need to Know 

Psychological safety is no longer just an HR concern. Ontario employers are increasingly expected to identify and address workplace factors that can contribute to psychological harm. From harassment and bullying to WSIB mental stress claims, failing to manage these risks can have legal consequences. Learn what psychological safety means in practice and why employers should take proactive steps now.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]