School Re-Opening and Issues for Employers

employers options as schools re-open
Photo by Austin Distel on Unsplash

In some form or another, it’s looking like in-person learning will be going ahead this school year but that parents can keep their children home if they wish. In many cases, employers whose operations have been remote for the past several months are looking to bring employees back to the office. What if an employee doesn’t want to send their child back to school and subsequently insists that they cannot, therefore, come back into the office to work? What are an employer’s options?

Ask Why

If an employee will not be sending their child to school and insists that they too need to remain at home, ask why. While all things COVID-19 present novel legal situations, and we don’t yet have any certainty on how courts and tribunals will rule, it’s reasonable to assume that if your employee has a legitimate disability-related COVID-19 exposure concern this should be accommodated. Asking your employee why they are not sending their child to school allows them to raise their need for accommodation. 

Reasons which may reasonably require accommodation could include the child is high-risk or someone else in the household is high-risk. An employer should ask for medical documentation to support that the employee should not send their child to school due to a medical reason. 

If an employee states that they just don’t feel comfortable or that they prefer to keep their child at home, this would likely not be a reason attracting accommodation. Where public health advice suggests that sending kids to school is safe, an employer can rely on that direction absent legitimate medical evidence specific to the employee to suggest otherwise. 

Options for Accommodation

If an employee provides a legitimate reason for keeping their child home and needing to stay home themselves, an employer likely has a duty to accommodate. However, the accommodation does not have to be the one that the employee chooses. While employers may have been flexible early in the pandemic, it is not reasonable for an employee to expect to be able to care for small children learning remotely and also work from home full-time. An employee in this scenario could be placed on an unpaid leave, on reduced work hours or an alternate schedule. The employer will generally have a duty to accommodate the employee up to the point of undue hardship.  

Where the employee insists that they cannot come back to work, but has not established a need for accommodation – they are keeping their child home out of preference and not for a substantiated medical reason – an employer may choose to offer the employee an unpaid leave or may choose to take the position that the employee is abandoning their employment by refusing to return to work. There is no perfect answer here, and while we as of yet don’t know how decision-makers would view this situation, where possible employers should likely be flexible. 

To read more about Family Status accommodations in the COVID-19 context check out our previous post. If you have questions about bringing your employees back to work, get in touch for a consultation. 

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Blue alarm clock representing timing and Ontario employment termination clauses after Baker

“At Any Time” Gets Its Time: Is There Any Certainty for Ontario Employers After Baker? 

Ontario employers finally have more guidance on employment termination clauses. In Baker v Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc.; Li v Wayfair Canada ULC, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld clauses using “at any time” and “for any reason.”

But Baker doesn’t give every employment contract a free pass. We unpack what the decision means for employers reviewing termination language today.

Read More »
Hands typing on a keyboard in front of illuminated computer screens, representing virtual workplace communication and online workplace misconduct.

Virtual Harassment: When Workplace Misconduct Happens Online 

Virtual harassment is becoming a growing workplace issue as employee interactions increasingly happen through digital platforms. From group chats and messaging apps to social media activity, online conduct can create real workplace consequences. Learn why employers should update workplace policies, extend conduct expectations beyond the office, and take a proactive approach to investigating and addressing virtual misconduct.

Read More »
December 31, 2026 AODA filing deadline for Ontario employers, displayed beside champagne glasses and gold New Year decorations

The Accessibility Deadline Many Ontario Businesses Don’t Know About: December 31, 2026

Ontario businesses and non-profits with 20 or more employees must file an AODA accessibility compliance report by December 31, 2026. Before certifying compliance, employers should confirm their headcount, complete required training, review accessibility policies and plans, address gaps, and file early. SpringLaw explains the deadline, key requirements, and practical steps Ontario employers should take now, before they file.

Read More »

Contact Us

Thank You For Your Interest. Kindly Complete The Form Below. Our Client Services team will be in touch with further information about our fees and intake process.
[grow-contact-form]